Locating Business Partners Worldwide
Where Global Trading Begins
- Subscribe
keep informed
about Trader
Commodity B2B
Home    Trader Q&A      Procedures       Circumvention      Articles    Buyers   Sellers      Companies   Help     Contact Us   Disclaimer
©2008 Trader Commodity B2B

There are risks and lost opportunities in using UCP500 or UCP600 for standbys. Because of the great
advantage of rules, many standbys are issued subject to the UCP. The reason that not all standbys are
issued subject to rules is the UCP itself. Drafted for commercial LCs, UCP presents serious difficulties
for standby users. It is for these reasons that the ISP was created and it is these problems that ISP

Does UCP600 Address Any of These Issues to Make the UCP More Appropriate for Standbys?

Not to any extent. The only difference is that UCP600 makes it clear that its provisions do not apply to
copies of transport documents.

ISP98 has 89 rules specifically drafted to reflect current standby practice. UCP500 and UCP600 have
only a handful of articles that pertain directly to standbys and have several articles that, if applied to
standbys, cause confusion in their interpretation and application.

ISP98 Rule 2.02 (Obligation of Different Branches, Agencies, or Other Offices) identifies an issuer’s
branch or other office as a separate “person”,
while UCP500 Article 2 and UCP600 Article 3 & 5
identify an issuer’s branch in another country as a separate entity. The difference here is that ISP looks
at the capacity in which such branch or other office acts whereas the UCP considers only its geographic

ISP98 Rule 3.07 (Separateness of Each Presentation) provides that the failure to make any number
of scheduled or permitted presentations DOES NOT waive or negate the right to make
another timely presentation
under the standby. UCP500 Article 41 and UCP600 Article 32 stipulate
that if any installment is not drawn and/or shipped within the period allowed for that installment, the
credit CEASES TO BE AVAILABLE for that and any subsequent installments.

ISP98 Rule 3.07 also effectively eliminates the unwritten principle of “precedence”, by stating
that the honor of a non-complying presentation does not waive the requirements of the standby for
future presentations.

ISP98 Rule 3.08 (Partial Drawing and Multiple Presentations; Amount of Drawings) defines the
meanings of partial drawings and multiple drawings
(permitted and not permitted) specifically as
they relate to standbys. UCP500 Article 40 and UCP600 Article 31 refer to partial shipments and
drawings that primarily pertain to commercial credits.

ISP98 Rule 3.13 (Expiration Date on a Non-Business Day) provides for the expiry date AND last date
for presentation and any other date relative to presentation, to be
extended to next business day, if
such day falls on a non-business day. UCP500 Article 44(b) and UCP600 Article 29(c) expressly
exclude the last shipment date and all other similar dates that may be stated in the credit.

ISP98 Rule 3.14 (Closure on a Business Day and Authorization of Another Reasonable Place for
provides an opportunity to present documents within 30 days of a re-opening
after a closure caused by “force majeure”
or any other reason. UCP500 Article 17 and UCP600
Article 36 do not provide the beneficiary the opportunity to present documents once the bank has

ISP98 Rule 4.03 (Examination for Inconsistency) states that an examiner is NOT required to
examine documents against each other to determine inconsistenc
y, except as might be
required by the standby. UCP500 Article 13(a) and UCP600 Article 14(d) DO require an examiner to
examine the documents against each other to determine inconsistency.

The requirement for documents in “two copies” or “two fold” under the ISP98 Rule 4.15
(Original, Copy, and Multiple Documents) is satisfied by presentation of either two originals or two
copies or one of each. Under UCP500 Article 20(c) and UCP600 Article 17(c), this requirement is
satisfied by presentation of one original and one or more copies.

ISP98 provides a “safe harbor” with respect to the time available for document examination.
It provides that notification of dishonor made within three banking days following the date of
presentation is deemed to be a “reasonable time”. Neither UCP500 nor UCP600 have a similar

ISP98 Rule 5.04 (Notice of Expiry) states that the issuer is not “precluded” by its failure to notify
a presenter that a presentation is being dishonored due to the presentation being made
after the expiry
date of a standby. There is no UCP500 or UCP600 article that covers the issue.

ISP98 Rule 6.02 (When Drawing Rights are Transferable), a standby may be transferred in
its entirety, more than once
and may NOT be partially transferred. Under UCP500 and UCP600 a
credit may be partially transferred but may not be transferred in its entirety more than once.
UCP: (Uniform Customs and Practice)
Key Differences for Standbys